INKBLOT DISPATCH
RESPONSE TO TRUMP STATEMENT ON EPSTEIN FILES
“Let Pam Bondi do her job.”
We agree. The public deserves to understand what that job entails and why the Epstein files remain sealed under multiple administrations, including Trump's first term.
The Epstein files are not an “Obama creation.”
They originate from sealed court proceedings, federal plea agreements, and trafficking cases across state and federal jurisdictions dating back to 2005 (before Obama took office).
The Trump administration (through AGs like Bill Barr) had full access to Epstein-related records and chose not to release key materials. Barr’s DOJ even attempted to suppress portions of the Southern District of New York's investigations before Epstein’s death.
The “why didn’t they use it against MAGA” question misleads.
Public records already associate Trump's social, financial, and travel history with Epstein’s network. The issue isn’t what was used, but what’s protected.
If the files were fake, there’d be no legal resistance to releasing them. Instead, we’ve seen bipartisan silence, redactions, and media throttling which suggests leverage, not fabrication.
🧠 TOW:
This isn’t about guilt by association.
It’s about how many institutions are invested in keeping the truth from public record.
Your deflections signal that whatever’s in those files, you’d rather talk about anything else, including John F. Kennedy
✨ ETHER:
Some names were buried.
Others were edited out.
But the pattern remains.
And the ones who fear it most
scream loudest when the files flicker
CLOSING LINE FOR REPORT:
The public will stop asking when the records are open, the victims are heard, and the network is dismantled and not before.
Until then, we watch.
We ask.
We tow.