They Buried the Cash Flow, So We’re Spotlighting It
A recently leaked federal study found that refugees brought in $63 billion more than they cost over a 10-year span.
A leaked federal draft report from the Department of Health & Human Services found that refugees generated $63 billion more in revenue than they cost U.S. governments between 2005–2014.
But when the White House learned it clashed with Stephen Miller’s anti-refugee narrative, he had it scrubbed:
The 55‑page draft was shelved.
A 3‑page version was released focusing only on costs
Internal emails show Miller demanded the revenue gains be omitted, calling it “embarrassing” and insisting the final version support the policy line.
They didn’t censor because it was wrong.
They censored because it was true.
💡 What This Means
Refugees didn’t drain the system, they funded it.
The White House chose fear-based cuts over fiscal honesty.
Millennials of propaganda weaponized a moral story at a real monetary cost.
🧭 Questions to Surface
If refugees are net contributors, why portray them as costly?
How many other studies were altered to fit a talking point?
📌 What This Proves
The “economic threat” story was fabricated.
The truth wasn’t inconvenient — it was profitable, and they deleted it anyway.
Refugees weren’t draining the system. They were funding it.
The full 55-page draft was shelved.
The public got a cost-only summary.
The policymaker got a headline.
And the lie lived on.
TOW
We don’t have a refugee problem.
We have a propaganda problem.The same architects of cruelty used “cost” as cover.
Not to balance the books…
But to punish the unwanted.
🕳️ Tow the line. Archive the shadow.
More reads:
Trump’s Own Study Shows Refugees Benefit U.S. Economy
How Stephen Miller Single-Handedly Got the U.S. to Accept Fewer Refugees